Archives For August 2015

Trademark infringement occurs when one party uses another party’s trademark in commerce in such a way that consumers are likely to be confused as to the first party’s goods or services. Whether consumers are likely to be confused is a question of fact that must be decided during a trial (or by the parties in settlement negotiations, when possible).

The nine factors below are helpful in making this decision and are used by courts and lawyers in most trademark litigation lawsuits. As a result, they are good factors for you to think about if you find yourself being accused of infringement or if you think someone is infringing on your mark.

1. Strength of the Plaintiff’s Mark

Assuming the plaintiff has a valid trademark, they will look to the strength of the mark to decide how much protection it deserves. As you can learn in this post, arbitrary/fanciful marks receive the most protection, suggestive marks the second most, and descriptive marks the least. (And generic marks never receive protection.)

2. Similarity of the Marks

Courts will look at three items when comparing the two marks. First is sight, do the marks look alike when written next to each other. Second, do the marks sound the same when spoken. And third, do they have the same or similar meanings when looked up in a dictionary. The more similar the marks are from those viewpoints, the more likely trademark infringement is to be found.

3. Similarity of the Goods or Services

Related to the last point, the court will review how similar the goods or services are to one another. If one mark is used to sell enterprise computer software and the other used to sell iPhone games, those might be considered similar enough as to cause confusion. On the other hand, if the other were used to sell grass seed, then they would probably be sufficiently different to avoid a finding of trademark infringement.

4. The Likelihood the Plaintiff will Expand into the Defendant’s Market

For common law trademarks (which only receive protection in their geographical areas and natural zones of expansion) courts will look to whether the plaintiff is likely to enter the defendant’s market. For example, a food truck operator in Miami might be able to prevent a similarly named food truck from operating in Orlando, but probably not in Portland (which is why the Miami operator should get a federal registration – for nationwide rights).

5. Actual Confusion

A court can find trademark infringement even if actual consumer confusion is not present – all that is needed is likely confusion. Of course, if you have evidence of actual confusion such as your customers going to a competitor’s location due to their infringement that goes a long way towards proving an infringement case.

6. Sophistication of Buyers

Courts will also consider how much effort a consumer is likely to put into the purchasing decision. The more effort (such as buying a plane) the less likely they are to be confused because they should learn of the different source during their research. The less likely (such as buying clothes), the more likely they are to be confused as to the source because they likely will not do a ton of research into the source.

7. The Defendant’s Intent

While not a technical requirement, courts often look at this consideration because if bad faith can be shown, it is clear evidence of infringement.

8. Quality of Defendant’s Goods

When determining damages, a court is likely to look to whether the defendant’s goods were shotty. If so, that could harm the goodwill of the plaintiff and entitle the plaintiff to greater damages.

9. Consent Agreements

If the plaintiffs have an agreement under which the defendant was granted permission to use the mark, then that will obviously lessen the likelihood that confusion exists and therefore negate an infringement claim.

Stay Current

We hope our blog is helpful to you in terms of teaching you what you need to know about trademark law. To stay up to date, be sure to connect with us on Twitter & Facebook!


Image: Thinkstock/adolf34
*This article is very general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Readers with legal questions should consult with an attorney prior to making any legal decisions.

 

Startups and businesses of all sizes often struggle to obtain the right domain name for their companies. Many third parties own domain names you may want to use and they often have a legal right to do so. However, when they don’t have such a legal right, and when you have a valid trademark claim to the domain, the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) may allow you to force them to transfer the domain to you.

Let’s take a look at the law and what it means to you and your business.

What is Cybersquatting

The ACPA can be used to resolve a lot of different types of abuses. For example, if someone registers a domain using your trademark and offers to sell the domain to you for a large sum of money, that may be a violation of the ACPA. It can also be used to prohibit someone from improperly profiting from the commercial use of your trademark. Further, you can use the ACPA to prevent someone from tarnishing your mark, for example using your trademark in a phonographic website name.

How to Win a ACPA Claim

To win such an argument, you must show certain things, some of which can be hard. Below is a summary of things to consider when deciding if you have a good claim.

1. Valid trademark rights

You must show that you have valid trademark rights. But not just any trademark rights – rather, you must have a trademark that is distinctive or famous. This can sometimes be hard to prove.

2. Where and how your mark is used

To win a ACPA claim you will have to show that the other party registered or trafficked in or otherwise used a domain name that improperly uses your trademark.

Further, you often cannot win a ACPA claim if your mark is used after the top level domain. For example, if someone used “MightyMarks” in a path (like domain.com/mightymarks) it would be hard for us to win a claim. But if they used it in the second level domain (like WeAreMightyMarks.com) we would have a good chance of winning our claim.

3. Time of registration

To prevail under an ACPA claim, you must also be able to show that the registration of the domain in question was made after your trademark became distinctive or famous. This obviously makes it hard for new companies to win under a ACPA claim.

4. Typo domains are also covered

Often times you will find misspelling and typo domains that create problems. For example, if someone created MightyMarksBl0g.com (note the zero in place of the “o”), that would be considered a typo domain. In such a circumstance, even though the domain is not identical to our domain, a court would still likely find in our favor because it would still be confusingly similar to our domain.

5. Bad faith

You must also prove that the other party acted in mad faith. This is probably the hardest element of winning an ACPA claim. Specifically, you must show that the other party acted with “a bad faith intent to profit from” your trademark.

As a result, if another party is using your trademark in a different geographic region, or for a different type of goods or services, even if the use is only minimal, you may have an uphill battle in front of you. Another example is when someone registers their name or nickname. In those situations, even if they are similar to your trademark, they may have a legitimate use and therefore it may be hard to win a claim against that person.

On the other hand, if someone registers a domain incorporating your trademark and immediately tries to sell you the domain for a high price, that is usually pretty good evidence of a bad faith intent. In these situations, you can often win a claim against that person.

What should you do?

If you find yourself with a possible ACPA claim, you should definitely speak to an attorney about your case. he or she can advise you of your rights and talk about what damages and equitable remedies are available to you (we will cover those in a future post).

Find this helpful?

If you enjoyed this post, you should subscribe to our quarterly newsletter, Mighty Updates, to stay on top of trademark news and legal issues.


Image: Thinkstock/TheaDesign
*This article is very general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Readers with legal questions should consult with an attorney prior to making any legal decisions.